The Supreme Court of India has expressed serious concerns about the increasing trend of demolishing houses using bulldozers, especially when such actions are carried out without following proper legal procedures. This issue, often referred to as “bulldozer justice,” has been making headlines as authorities in various states have used this method to target properties allegedly linked to criminal activities.
During a recent hearing, the apex court questioned how homes could be demolished in this manner, asking whether the law allows for such drastic actions without proper judicial scrutiny. The court’s remarks came in the context of petitions challenging the demolition drives carried out by state authorities.
The Supreme Court’s comments highlight the need for adherence to the rule of law, emphasizing that demolitions must be carried out only after following due process. The court underscored that any punitive action, including demolitions, must be in accordance with established legal norms and should not be used as a tool for instant justice.
This stance by the top court serves as a reminder that even in cases involving serious criminal allegations, the rights of individuals must be protected. The judiciary’s intervention is crucial in ensuring that justice is not only done but is seen to be done, and that authorities do not overstep their legal boundaries in their efforts to maintain law and order.
The court has sought detailed explanations from state authorities regarding the legal basis for these demolitions, signaling its intent to scrutinize the practice more closely. This development is seen as a significant step toward safeguarding citizens’ rights and preventing the misuse of power by the authorities.
The issue of “bulldozer justice” has sparked widespread debate, with critics arguing that it undermines the rule of law and sets a dangerous precedent. The Supreme Court’s intervention could pave the way for more stringent checks on such practices, ensuring that justice is administered fairly and in accordance with the law.
